Ray White Aspley · Client case study

Client
Ray White Aspley
Industry
Client case study
Services
Google Ads management
Ray White Aspley

01 / THE STARTING POINT

Where the work began.

The account served a network of ten offices, but its ad groups mixed multiple suburbs and services together. That made it harder to connect a particular search with a useful message and harder to see which parts of the account deserved the budget.

The starting cost per lead was $85. The task was not simply to produce more clicks. It was to make the existing advertising work harder by improving the relevance of the journey from search to enquiry.

02 / THE CHALLENGE

A local customer was meeting a broad campaign.

Property intent varies by service and place. When those differences are combined into broad ad groups, the same message can be shown to people with quite different needs. Irrelevant clicks consume budget before an office has a chance to speak to a suitable prospect.

03 / THE STRATEGY

We rebuilt the structure around focused search intent, then connected the ad copy and landing page to that intent. The organising principle was relevance: the page should continue the conversation started by the search and the ad.

Measurement had to support the restructure. Conversion tracking across the offices and search-term review created a clearer basis for continued decisions, instead of using click volume as a substitute for enquiry quality.

04 / WHAT WE DID

STRATEGY,
IN PRACTICE.

01

Separate intent within the account.

The restructure moved away from ad groups that bundled suburbs and services together. A more focused account made it easier to understand what each part was trying to achieve.

  • Rebuild broad ad groups around specific intent.
  • Distinguish the relevant service and location.
  • Make budget waste easier to identify.
02

Connect search, ad and destination.

We sharpened the copy and aligned the landing pages. A visitor should see an immediately relevant next step after clicking, rather than having to find the promised service again.

  • Tighten the advertising message.
  • Align landing-page content with that message.
  • Keep the enquiry path relevant to the visitor’s intent.
03

Keep removing irrelevant demand.

Conversion tracking across the network and ongoing search-term filtering supported optimisation after the initial restructure.

  • Track conversions across the offices.
  • Review the actual searches behind clicks.
  • Filter irrelevant terms and refine the account over time.

05 / THE BUSINESS LOGIC

Improve the economics of acquiring an enquiry.

The recorded cost per lead moved from $85 to $25, a reduction of about 71%. That is an efficiency improvement: the same advertising budget can support more lead opportunities at the lower unit cost, provided the conditions hold.

The case also reports improved lead quality. That matters because a low-cost form fill is not valuable if it is the wrong enquiry. The result should be read as an acquisition improvement, not a claim that every lead became a listing or a sale.

06 / THE OUTCOME

$85 to $25 per lead.

The published project records lower cost per lead and improved lead quality across the ten-office network. The account structure, message, destination and measurement were brought into alignment.

Figures from Sun State Digital’s existing published case study. The approximate 71% reduction is calculated from $85 and $25. No listing revenue or sales uplift is attributed here.

Visit Ray White Aspley ↗Talk about your business

Your next move

Tell us what you want to improve. We will help you work out a practical next step for your website, marketing and follow-up.

Start with a conversation. No invented promises.

SUN STATE footer

Websites, marketing and automation built to help good businesses become better known.

Brisbane-based. Working with ambitious businesses across Australia.

Book a strategy call